Skip to main content

My Vice Presidential debate prediction was spot on

I don't like to toot my own horn (unless I'm in the shower and the mood suddenly strikes me of course), but I happen to be quite pleased with myself following the prediction I made on Tuesday and in watching the Vice Presidential debate last night.

As I wrote on Tuesday, "In a CNN poll, it showed that 55% of voters expect Ryan to win the debate, compared to 39% who felt Biden would win - a +16% for Ryan. That margin isn't quite as great as Obama's preceding last week's debate, but is still quite significant and due to this, I have a feeling that Biden will be seen as at least coming close to a push when all is said and done, if not being seen as the outright winner. This isn't to say that from an overall quality of performance perspective, I feel that the Vice President will triumph tomorrow. However, due to the lower expectations residing over Vice President Biden, I feel he'll be able to live up to and exceed those expectations to make it appear to both the news-media and viewers that he fought Congressman Ryan to at least a draw, if not an outright victory over him."

While NBC and CNN seemed to see the debate as a draw, CBS, MSNBC and The Huffington Post saw it as a clear Joe Biden victory. The two snap polls were conducted by CNN and CBS and like after last week's presidential debate, the two resulted in drastically different numbers. 

In CNN's poll, they actually had Ryan winning 48% of the vote to 44% for Biden, with a margin of error of +/-5%. In the CBS poll, Biden won 50% of the vote in comparison to just 31% for Ryan. That's a difference of 23%. So, what gives? Well, like I said after last week in claiming that CBS' numbers, which showcased Romney winning 46% to 22% for Obama, were more accurate than CNN's, I believe that's the case this time as well. 

One key difference between the two polls is that the CNN poll included everybody and the CBS poll was solely focused on undecided voters. So according to CNN, on the surface, Ryan won amongst all voters by 4% (within the margin of error, so CNN called it a tie) and according to CBS, Biden won amongst undecided voters by 19%. 

The problem with the CNN poll is the same problem they ran into after last week's debate. After last week's poll was released, they admitted to perhaps oversampling Republicans. They admitted something similar following the release of last night's poll. Their sample size was 381 registered voters whom watched the debate, 31% of whom were Democrats and 33% whom were Republican - an 8-point bias in favor of Republicans when compared to CNN's poll average of all Americans. So, if we adjust the numbers accordingly, Ryan would go from +4 to -4 and when we take the margin of error into account, the range would be anything from Ryan at +1 to Biden at +9. So, when properly adjusting the sample bias, the result alters from a push/advantage Ryan to a push/advantage Biden. 

Due to all the problems with the CNN poll, I'm much more inclined to trusting the CBS poll results. 

So, like I said not to toot my own horn, but as I wrote on Tuesday, "...This isn't to say that from an overall quality of performance perspective, I feel that the Vice President will triumph tomorrow. However, due to the lower expectations residing over Vice President Biden, I feel he'll be able to live up to and exceed those expectations to make it appear to both the news-media and viewers that he fought Congressman Ryan to at least a draw, if not an outright victory over him."

I couldn't have said it better myself. Wait, I guess I did say it myself. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...