Skip to main content

A Florida Republican Senator says executions aren't about guilt or innocence, but about "timely justice"

The Florida Senate recently passed the "Timely Justice Act," which attempts to speed up the execution process on Death Row inmates, even at the risk of bypassing DNA results that could showcase the inmate's innocence. Republican Governor Rick Scott is expected to sign the bill into law.

Arthenia Joyner, a Democratic Tampa attorney who voted against this bill, said, "Is swift justice fair justice? We have seen cases where, years later, convicted people were exonerated."

Senator Maria Sachs, another Democratic attorney, echoed Ms. Joyner's sentiments, saying, "I don't see the reason for swiftness, especially with DNA evidence that can exonerate."

What was Republican Senator Rob Bradley's response to such statements? I'll allow him to tell you himself. Bradley countered these before-mentioned arguments by saying, "This is not about guilt or innocence, it's about timely justice."

That has to be one of the dumbest statements I've read for a while. It's not about guilt or innocence? It's about timely justice? Really? How in the world can it be justice, timely or otherwise, if an innocent person is killed?

I can imagine Senator Bradley engaging in the following discussion with a Critical Thinking professor:

Professor Gene Witty: "So, you executed Forrest Woods last week, eh?"

Senator Rob Bradley: "We sure did!"

Witty: "You do realize his DNA results just came back and he was found innocent, right?"

Bradley: "Oh well. At least the process was quicker and cheaper than usual!"

Witty: "But he didn't do anything..."

Bradley: "Yeah, well, you win some and you lose some."

Witty: "He had a wife and three kids..."

Bradley: "Yeah, I kind of feel bad for them, but hey, that's life - you've gotta move on!"

Witty: "...and the killer is still out there..."

Bradley: "Yeah, I know. Professor Witty, this isn't about guilt or innocence. It's about timely justice, and that's what we got when we executed Mr. Woods - timely justice; justice that was timely."

Witty: "So, your view of justice is killing an innocent man with a wife and three kids, while allowing the killer to continue walking the streets? That's justice to you?"

Bradley: "Not just justice, timely justice!"

Witty: "I think it'd be timely justice if you were voted out of office tomorrow."

Bradley: "Say what? I didn't kill anyone."

Witty: "You voted to speed up this process which resulted in the killing of an innocent person, so yes, you indirectly did kill someone."

Bradley: "Yep - timely justice!"

Witty: "Whatever..."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/29/us-usa-florida-deathpenalty-idUSBRE93S0UT20130429?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...
Post a Comment
Read more