Skip to main content

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter.

I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some.

When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following:

"It's human nature to look."

"There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!"

"It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!"

"It's natural to find people attractive."

When observing the array of comments, I immediately think about semantics. Do some see "looking" and "checking out" as synonymous with one another, while others do not? How do these people define such terms? To me, there is a stark difference between the two. "Looking" is a fairly innocent act in my opinion. Wherever I go, I people-watch. If I'm at an airport, a bar, a restaurant, a mall, etc., I often times "look" at people, regardless of age, gender, or level of physical attractiveness. This isn't an act of lust or betrayal. It's simply an act of curiosity and fascination. "Checking out," meanwhile, means something completely different to me. "Checking out" constitutes a man or woman staring at and drooling over a member of the opposite sex he or she finds attractive. When I hear about a man "checking out" a woman, I typically visualize him eye-f**king her as Vince Vaughn's character words it in the film Wedding Crashers. Chances are he's staring at her backside, chest, pretty much everything from head to toe, and trying to work his magical mental powers by visualizing her naked, followed by some lovely fantasies. So, to me, while "looking" is innocent and void of any lust or betrayal, "checking out" is sexual and inappropriate if involved in a serious relationship.

Eyes are made for looking. If we don't look, what on earth do we do with them? Sight is a grand sense to possess and not to sound like the plastic bag obsessor from the film American Beauty, but it really is quite something to be able to observe all the beauty in this world. So, if a serious couple simply looks at members of the opposite sex, I don't see anything wrong with it. However, if either or both of them are "checking out" these same individuals, I really have to wonder how much longer the relationship is going to last, because if one longs for another physically or sexually, he/she obviously either isn't satisfied in the current relationship or is disloyal at his/her core.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...