Skip to main content

Not everyone seems happy about the peace talks with Syria

With Syria appearing to accept Russia's proposal to hand over its chemical weapons, it will most likely prevent any U.S. strike on the country. In my mind, this is a very good thing. Achieving what we want through diplomatic means and not military force will save us money, lives, and drastically decrease potential terrorist backlash from Syrian extremists. However, not everyone feels this way.

Many bobblehead dolls over at Fox News and even some war-hungry politicians (::ahem, Senator McCain::), without the need for Viagra, seemed to get hard at the thought of war, and are beginning to go limp in light of these proposed peace talks. According to them, if President Obama doesn't follow through with air strikes on Syria, then not only will all of them go limp, so too will the Washington Monument and the rest of America!

Yes, because even though using military force on Syria would increase the chance for another war, more money spent, more lives lost, and falling victim to another terrorist attack, it's better to leave one more vulnerable to those risks than to look like a pussy by not bombing somebody. With that kind of logic, the following scenarios would also make sense:

Scenario: Major drug deal near a public park 

President Obama: "Alright, there's a heavy-duty drug deal that's supposedly going to go down near a public park today. The dealers think we won't do much since kids will likely be in the area at the time. I heard Senator McCain suggest we just start firing machine guns in the area. While I can understand wanting to get these drug dealers once and for all, if we do that, we'll be endangering the lives of kids and their parents as well. I just don't know about that."

Senator McCain: "Come on, don't be a pussy!"


Scenario: Gang fight near a nursery

President Obama: "Word has it that a pair of gangs are going to battle for the corner by a nursery in the area. Senator McCain just told me he thinks we should send some of our strongest men out there to punch everyone that moves. I guess my only question is, what if we punch the wrong people, and women and children are hit?"

Senator McCain: "Come on, don't be a pussy!"


Scenario: Man steals a car

President Obama: "So, I guess a guy stole a car in the area. I think we should go about this thing quietly and catch him fairly soon, but Senator McCain had another idea. He suggested we get into a high-speed chase with the guy. Kids were just let out of school, though. Wouldn't this chase endanger these kids in school buses and other people as well? Would the chase really be worth it?"

McCain: "Come on, don't be a pussy!"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"