Skip to main content

A Columbus Dispatch Game

Let's play a game. I'm going to share with you a letter-to-the-editor I read in today's Columbus Dispatch, will then provide you some multiple-choice options on what the Dispatch titled the writing, and will then give readers the answer. Sound good?

Okay, so first off, here is the letter-to-the-editor, which was written by Ray Cacchione of Columbus, Ohio:

"I admire Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump for coming right out and saying that women who get abortions should get 'some form of punishment' as opposed to the usual manner of Republican legislators punishing women by curtailing their reproductive rights ('Trump talk on abortion shocks many,' Dispatch article, Thursday).

 He is wrong, but at least he's honest, which is more than I can say about Gov. John Kasich (who just cut Planned Parenthood funding in Ohio) or Texas Sen. Ted Cruz."

 So, having read that, what do you think the Dispatch decided to title the piece?

A) Trump Is Wrong As Always

B) Trump's Honest, But Wrong

C) Thoughts On Trump's Abortion Comments

D) Trump Says What Others Think

E) Trump Just Said What Kasich and Cruz Did

:: plays the Jeopardy soundtrack on repeat for a few minutes ::

...and the answer is... (scroll down)








D) Trump Says What Others Think. That's right, even though the writer said Trump is wrong when it comes to his stance on abortion and insinuated that his recent controversial comments on the matter were ridiculous, the Dispatch decided to title the piece, "Trump Says What Others Think." Either the Dispatch is getting incredibly lazy or they accidentally let their biases slip out into the open (again). In any case, this is a big-time fail for the paper. Sadly, it's not the first time I've run into this problem with the Dispatch, and chances are it won't be the last...

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2016/04/02/1-trump-says-what-others-think.html
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more