Skip to main content

Glenn Beck’s Strategery

I've never been a fan of Fox News, from Sean Hannity to Bill O'Reilly to Brit Hume to the morning crew and beyond (Shepard Smith being the lone exception), but Glenn Beck is another beast entirely. While Hannity and O'Reilly make me shake my head at their angry rhetoric and heavy slant, Beck simultaneously frightens me and makes me laugh.

I laugh at the man and his show because the majority of what he says is so outlandish and ridiculous, his words and actions come across to me as over-the-top comedy more than anything. However, the fact that so many people listen to this guy and take his words seriously, that frightens me a bit.

Beck is quite a fan of the chalkboard and using the chalkboard to connect the dots of people and events to form a conspiracy. He's drawn links between different Democrats and the likes of Adolf Hitler, Stalin, etc. There are times when there are so many different lines drawn on the chalkboard, connecting one person and event to another, it really appears to be the final product of a child whom just connected the dots in a book. I don't even know how he does it. I have a theory of my own on the matter, though.

Every morning, Glenn Beck picks out anywhere from 3 to 6 things to connect from a random set of pieces of paper in a bowl. After he picks out these 3 to 6 names, places, events, political parties, ideologies, etc., he then gets to work. It doesn't matter if he draws: Stalin, Obama and Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer or cornfields, Harry Reid and thunderstorms or even Nancy Pelosi, a firetruck and gravity. He will find a way to connect those dots and convince his audience that the Democrats are out to get them!

This is why most or all of conspiracy theories don't work to a T. There may be components of some theories that may hold some potential validity, but for a full conspiracy to work, every event, every connection made within the conspiracy has to be valid in order for the theory to work. This is nearly impossible. Mathematically speaking, it may not be impossible, but more than likely, next to impossible. So, when Beck tries to link three to six (or so) different people and events to one another, he may have a point with regard to one link, but for him to draw multiple links as he tends to do results in an utterly ridiculous theory. This is why I have to laugh at his rhetoric sometimes. His theories are so off-the-wall preposterous, my immediate reaction is that of laughter. Unfortunately, there are many whom don't laugh when Beck speaks and actually believe his every word. How anyone could believe this man's every word is beyond me. Perhaps he has a history of distributing spiked kool-aid to people and through this, is able to brainwash his supporters. In any case, I really hope people stop believing this clown and he winds up being just a phase. Even for how slanted Fox News is to begin with, Glenn Beck brings them to a whole new level partisanship and ridiculousness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...