Skip to main content

Honesty vs. Game-Playing

It's been a while since I've seriously dated, so it feels like I'm having to learn all over again. I'm having to learn the game-playing manual, when to be straight-forward and when to hold back a bit, when to be completely honest and when to give a half-truth. I have to say, I'm not liking these new rules or rewritings of rules.

The saying goes, "Don't hate the player, hate the game." My question is, if the players hate the game, why play the game in the first place? Then there would be no players or game.

I've heard or read people say things such as, "When he/she asks you out, either say you'll have to get back to them after you've had time to check your schedule or say you're busy that night, but ask for a rain check, so as to not let them think you have a lot of free time, that you don't have much going on in your life, that sort of thing." Why? I don't understand this. If one is excited about the prospect of going on a date with a person, why is it necessary to place them on hold, wondering to themselves if you're actually interested? Perhaps I'm too honest, but if someone I'm interested in asks me out, I'd be hard-pressed to put them on hold as opposed to saying, "Yeah, sure, that sounds great." I mean, what if I said I'd get back to them and they had already bumped into someone else whom caught their interest while I was playing games? I'd then be questioning my decision for quite some time.

I've also read or heard the rule that you're not to call your date until 1-2 days after the date. Again, why? If the date went really well, you were excited about the prospect of a second date and can't get this person out of your head, why can't you call before and show this joy and excitement? What's wrong about feeling a connection with a person, having a great time with them and wanting to see them again in the near future?

I just don't understand game-playing, two people, whom have a mutual interest in one another, to try and be one move ahead of the other to prevent themselves from getting hurt. That's all I see it as, a means to prevent oneself from being hurt. Nobody likes being hurt, but I just wonder if game-playing limits two people's potential, if they're so busy obsessing about their possibly being hurt in the future, that it becomes more difficult to discover their true potential as a couple.

It'll be difficult for me to ever take part in this "game-playing" that seems so common anymore and who knows, that may make me more prone to getting hurt than one whom commonly plays games, but I'd like to believe the final reward will be far greater for someone like myself whom doesn't take part in those very games.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...