Skip to main content

This country's spending priorities are bass ackwards

I've spent a lot of time recently talking about government spending and how it's my belief (and the numbers back me up on this) that we overspend on defense. This all started with a blog I wrote a couple weeks back in light of the talk concerning the budget and deficit. Two people then debated me on the issue at a bar this past weekend. A couple days later, I read and wrote about an article concerning the $436 million Congress is proposing we spend on additional Abrams army tanks the army says it doesn't need. That brings me to today, where I read a report regarding where our tax dollars went in 2012.

In 2012, some of the spending went as follows:

- 19% of the budget was spent on defense ($689 billion)

- 7% was spent on benefits for federal retirees and veterans ($254 billion)

- 3% was spent on infrastructure ($109 billion)

- 2% was spent on education ($73 billion)

- 2% was spent on science and medical research ($73 billion)

Those numbers aren't typos. In 2012, we spent roughly $180 billion more on defense than we did on veterans' benefits, infrastructure, education, and research combined. We spent a great deal more money on sending troops overseas than we did in taking care of them when they returned home. Poor infrastructure, which is far more dangerous on a regular basis than terrorism, received only 16% of the spending that defense received. Education and research are vitally important for any country to continually grow in a number of areas, yet they combined to only receive $146 billion in spending, compared to $689 billion for defense.

What's more important for the future of this country - to improve our education system, improve our infrastructure, and make significant strides in science and medicine, or to ease our paranoia of terrorism?

I say "paranoia," because that's largely what it is. According to the 2011 death statistics, the following is true:

- "You are 17,600 times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack."

- "You are 12,571 times more likely to die from cancer than from a terrorist attack."

- "You are 11,000 times more likely to die in an airplane accident than from a terrorist plot involving an airplane."

- "You are 1,048 times more likely to die from a car accident than from a terrorist attack."

- "You are 404 times more likely to die in a fall than from a terrorist attack."

- "You are 87 times more likely to drown than die in a terrorist attack."

- "You are 13 times more likely to die in a railway accident than from a terrorist attack."

- "You are 12 times more likely to die from accidental suffocation in bed than from a terrorist attack."

- "You are 9 times more likely to choke to death on your own vomit than die in a terrorist attack."

- "You are 8 times more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a terrorist."

- "You are 8 times more likely to die from accidental electrocution than from a terrorist attack."

- "You are 6 times more likely to die from hot weather than from a terrorist attack."

That's right. We spend nearly $700 billion a year to defend this country from something which is 404 times less likely to kill us than falling, while we largely neglect our veterans, schools, roads, and research. In this country, it seems as if fear and paranoia have come to dominate common sense and rationality.

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=1258

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/04/statistics-you-are-not-going-to-be-killed-by-terrorists.html

http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20080508135851/http://nsc.org/research/odds.aspx

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...