Skip to main content

Conservatives delusional about Ted Cruz

Want to know why the Republican Party has had so many problems during the past couple presidential elections? Their candidates are moving further and further to the right (either by their own volition or being forced in that direction), while this country is seemingly moving further and further to the left. Both John McCain and Mitt Romney were viewed as moderate Republicans heading into primary season, but were forced to appear further to the right on the political spectrum than they actually were to become the party's presidential nominee. This resulted in flip-flopping, and with that, trust issues when election season was officially underway. This played a factor in their eventually losing the elections. If they had run as the moderates they had always been viewed as before the primaries, they would have likely had much greater chances of appealing to a wider array of voters - independents, in particular. But moderate Republicans appear to be going the way of the Dodo bird - either being voted out of office or changing party affiliation.

All poll numbers show that New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, so long as he held true to his beliefs during primary season, would give the Republican Party its best chance of winning the presidential election in 2016. However, would he be able to win over enough conservatives during the primaries to become the party's nominee? According to the new straw poll, that seems unlikely at this point.

The Family Research Council Action conducted a straw poll on who conservatives want to be the party's next presidential nominee and released these results:

1. Ted Cruz (Texas Senator): 42%

2. Ben Carson (Fox News contributor): 13%

3. Rick Santorum (former Pennsylvania Senator): 13%

4. Rand Paul (Kentucky Senator): 6%

5. Marco Rubio (Florida Senator): 5%

The vice presidential straw poll results looked like this:

1. Ben Carson: 21%

2. Ted Cruz: 17%

3. Michele Bachmann (Minnesota Congresswoman): 9%

Here's the problem with these results - none of these potential candidates have a very realistic shot of winning the presidency. The most likely of the bunch would be Rand Paul or Marco Rubio if they ran as someone's vice presidential pick.

According to the latest such Gallup poll, only 28% of people in this country hold a favorable view of the Republican Party (an all-time low for either party), while 62% hold an unfavorable view of the party. I would like to believe these kinds of horrific numbers would smack many Congressional Republicans in the face and make them realize some changes need to be made within the party if they're going to win another presidential election anytime soon. However, that doesn't seem to be the case.

Take conservatives' top selection for their 2016 presidential nominee, Ted Cruz, who finished with over three times the vote of the second-place Ben Carson. According to a new Gallup poll, only 62% of Americans know who Cruz is. Only 26% of people hold a favorable view of him, while 36% hold an unfavorable view of the Texas Senator. Not only that, but 74% of Americans don't like how Congressional Republicans have handled the shutdown - of which Ted Cruz is seen by many as the architect. The longer the shutdown continues, the more Ted Cruz's name will pop up, and the more people will dislike him.

I read an article the other day by a conservative columnist. He said that Ted Cruz is a shoo-in to become president one day. I suppose, looking at the poll numbers I've posted (and others), if elections played out like the game of golf and the low score won, the columnist may have a point. Since elections don't work that way, however, I have a feeling this writer is smoking something that is not only damaging to his own health, but to the health of all his readers as well.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/10/12/cruz-wins-key-conservative-straw-poll/

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/360950/poll-cruz-increasingly-unpopular-katrina-trinko

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...