Skip to main content

Pat Robertson and Bob Beckel criticize SNL for their Tim Tebow skit

Televangelist Pat Robertson has recently criticized Saturday Night Live for their Tim Tebow skit this past weekend.

He referred to it as "anti-Christian bigotry that's just disgusting." He added, "If this had been a Muslim country and they had done that, and had Muhammad doing that stuff, you would have found bombs being thrown off, and bodies on the street. We need more religious faith in our society, we're losing our moral compass in our nation."

USA Today columnist Bob Beckel also got into the act, as he told Fox News the following - "First of all, it's despicable to display Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, like that on Saturday Night Live and they should be ashamed of themselves. And the fact that this keeps drawing attention to Tebow and Christianity and faith and Jesus and they make it into some sort of commercial operation...there's nothing funny about that."

The full article along with video clips of Robertson's tirade and the actual SNL skit can be read and viewed at the following site - http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/dish/201112/saturday-night-live-under-attack-thanks-tim-tebow-sketch

I'm not a religious person, so these kinds of skits aren't going to bother me nearly as much as those whom are in fact religious. At the same time, it is Saturday Night Live, They're not shy of stirring controversy and making fun of celebrities of all stripes, from the President of the United States to foreign leaders to professional athletes to religious leaders to actors and beyond. I'm not sure there's a person or a topic which is safe from satire on SNL. Get used to it, people. George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Dick Cheney, Joe Biden, Michael Phelps, God, Jesus, Pat Robertson, Britney Spears, Tom Cruise, need I continue?

I find Robertson's comments to be ridiculous. Surprise, surprise, right? The guy is 81 and has obviously lost it (that may have occurred many, many years ago). I wish he'd retire. In any case, what was he really insinuating with his comments? That he wishes the U.S. was more like Muslim countries in terms of our sensitivity to the prophet worshiped by the majority of people in this country?

"If this had been a Muslim country and they had done that, and had Muhammad doing that stuff, you would have found bombs being thrown off, and bodies on the street. We need more religious faith in our society, we're losing our moral compass in our nation."

I wonder if he really knows what he said there. I'm guessing he doesn't. With regard to his other comment about the skit demonstrating "anti-Christian bigotry," he needs to learn how to take a joke. If the jokes had been at the expense of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, the Democratic Party, Occupy Wall Street, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, etc., I can guarantee Robertson would not make a peep about how "disgusting" the skit was or that it was demonstrating bigotry of some kind. Double-standards aplenty. Gotta love them.

In the meantime, Pat, lighten up...and oh yeah, retire. Thank you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...