Skip to main content

A closer look at the Denver Broncos offense with Tim Tebow at the helm

As I just noted in another blog, Denver Broncos quarterback, Tim Tebow, played his best game as a starter thus far in today's 35-32 victory over the Minnesota Vikings. He completed 10 of 15 pass attempts for 202 yards and 2 touchdowns. This was the second game of Tebow's seven starts where the Broncos scored 30 or more points. In the other five games, the Broncos have scored 18 or less.

Like I said, today was Tebow's best game as a starter, but once again, we mustn't give all the credit to the young quarterback. The defense was very opportunistic, as they returned one interception for a touchdown, caused and recovered a fumble when the Vikings were driving and picked off another pass in the final two minutes to set up the game-winning field goal. In Tebow's seven starts, the defense and special teams have come up big. When we look inside the numbers, even when including the 38 points the Broncos scored against the Oakland Raiders and the 35 they put up today, the Broncos offense hasn't generated many points in Tebow's seven starts.

Including today's game, the Denver Broncos offense has been responsible for 88 points in Tebow's seven starts, an average of 12.6 per game. The defense has been responsible for 12 points, which comes to an average of 1.7 a game. Finally, the special teams has been responsible for 51 points or 7.3 per game. Add these three elements together and the Broncos have averaged 21.6 points a game with Tim Tebow as the starter.

In other words, Denver's offense has averaged a little over two touchdowns, the special teams has averaged a little over one touchdown (and extra point) and the defense has averaged close to a safety. So, let's give credit where credit is due. Denver's defense has done its part in 5 of 7 games. The special teams has scored its fair share of points. The offense has done just enough to put their team over the top at game's end. Tebow played very well today, but in the grand scheme of things, more credit and praise needs to be shared to the team as a whole than just the quarterback, Tebow in this case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"