Skip to main content

Not again... Garry Marshall does "Valentine's Day" and now "New Year's Eve"? Singles Unite!!!

When I saw the trailer for Garry Marshall's "Valentine's Day" last year, I had to be rushed to the hospital, as I was suffering from Linda Blair complex and my eyes were stuck in the back of my head from rolling them so far. I could tell from the previews that it was going to be God-awful. I enjoy some romantic comedies, those that include good chemistry between the leads, genuine dialogue, solid acting and direction and a somewhat different twist to the very formulaic plot of the genre. I had a good hunch that "Valentine's Day" wasn't going to include any of those and critics agreed with me. Sadly, the movie made $110.0 million.

On the site RottenTomatoes.com, 33 critics were showcased rating the film favorably, while 149 rated it poorly, an 18% favorable rating with an average score of 3.8 out of 10. Some of the headlines for the reviews were as follows:


“A perfect date movie: you’ll miss absolutely nothing of merit if you make out in the back row instead of watching the film.” - Tim Brayton (Antagony & Ecstasy)

“I loved a couple of the scenes in Valentine’s Day: the opening credits and the closing credits.” - Gary Wolcott (Tri-City Herald)

“Hope they had fun making Valentine’s Day. There’s little to be had watching it.” - Robert W. Butler (Kansas City Star)

“About as personal and memorable as a seasonal card your significant other snatches up from a local Duane Reade at the last minute.” - Simon Abrams (Slant Magazine)

“Light your money on fire and watch it burn. It will have an equivalent entertainment value and you’ll save on gas, parking and snacks.” - Marshall Fine (Hollywood & Fine)

Garry Marshall has now directed "New Year's Eve," which will be arriving in theaters nationwide this coming Friday. Like with "Valentine's Day," I began to groan at the sight of this trailer. Even my mother asked me after seeing the trailer, "Does this remind you of 'Valentine's Day'?"

I laughed and told her, "Funny story. It's actually the same director who did 'Valentine's Day'."

So, 8 reviews are in and 7 are rotten (13% favorable thus far) with an average score of 4.6 out of 10.

Some of the headlines for the reviews are as follows:


“Offering around a dozen barely there, aggressively agreeable mini-stores spliced together and spit out with lawnmower-style eloquence, the film is pushed to punishing lengths by the engorged cast list.” - Andrew Barker (Variety)

“The result proves to be as appealing and effervescent as a flute of flat champagne.” - Michael Rechtshaffen (Hollywood Reporter)

“If there is some kind of world record for schmaltz, this may have set it.” - Jake Coyle (Associated Press)

“Mayans might have predicted the end of the world in 2012, but could they have known that the countdown to eternal hellfire would begin with Garry Marshall’s New Year’s Eve?” - Melissa Anderson (Village Voice)

“This is a party you can’t wait to be over.” - Tim Grierson (Screen International)

So, what's next? Really? What movie will Garry Marshall next direct to depress singles and simultaneously make couples gag? He's already taken care of "Valentine's Day" and "New Year's Eve" - arguably the two most depressing holidays for singles. He will be hard-pressed to find another such day to provoke singles to hibernate for a while. I shouldn't tempt him. I dared Aaron Seltzer and Jason Friedberg to make a film following their disaster "Date Movie" and they've gone on to make several other atrocious films. So, forget I even said that, Mr. Marshall. Carry on. Wait, no, don't do that either. Eh...whatever.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"