Skip to main content

Seattle Seahawks 31 Philadelphia Eagles 14

I don't really have much to say here. The Eagles are banged up, as they played without quarterback Michael Vick and wide receiver Jeremy Maclin. They appear to have given up on the season at times. The play-calling has been terribly inconsistent this year. The defense has fluctuated more in effectiveness and position than Mitt Romney. While Philly is not mathematically eliminated from the playoffs, they are about as close as is possible. The funny thing is, the Eagles are 3-1 against NFC East teams (1-1 against the Giants and 1-0 versus both the Cowboys and Redskins) yet are now 1-7 against everyone else, with their only other win coming against the St. Louis Rams. They finished 1-3 against the horrendous NFC West, losing to Arizona, Seattle and San Francisco (this loss is excusable, but not how they lost in, in giving up another 4th quarter lead). Up next for the Eagles will be a road game against the revamped Miami Dolphins whom suddenly don't appear to be a team that started the year 0-7 and have played better than the Eagles of late. Since there's a week and a half rest for Philly having played on Thursday night, there's a good chance both Vick and Maclin will return for that game. In any case, the Eagles will have to defeat the Dolphins, along with the New York Jets, Dallas Cowboys and Washington Redskins to finish an even .500 at 8-8.

I'm wondering what those Vince Young praisers are saying now in light of Young's three starts with the Eagles. In three starts and one snap, Young has tossed 9 interceptions in just 114 pass attempts. That comes out to 7.9% of his pass attempts are picked off by the opposing team. Michael Vick has thrown a healthy number of interceptions this year with 11, but that came in 300 pass attempts, which comes out to roughly 3% of his attempts. Young hasn't started for a while, so I'm willing to give the guy a break, but to say he should start over a healthy Michael Vick is like saying Tim Tebow is more clutch than Aaron Rodgers... Speaking of which... I JUST read an article about that and will be writing a blog about how ludicrous it is.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more