Skip to main content

College Football Conference Strength Rankings... going into the bowl games...

Going into the bowl games, here is a rundown of how I rank the six major conferences. The rankings could change depending on the bowl outcomes, of course. First off, I'll run down the conference standings. To the left of the team's standing in the conference will read one of the following symbols: * (bowl eligible) or x (bowl ineligible) (? for UCLA). Here we go...

ACC
*1. Virginia Tech (11-2)
*2. Clemson (10-3)
*3. Florida State (8-4)
*3. Georgia Tech (8-4)
*3. Virginia (8-4)
*6. North Carolina (7-5)
*6. North Carolina State (7-5)
*8. Miami (Florida) (6-6)
*8. Wake Forest (6-6)
x10. Boston College (4-8)
x11. Duke (3-9)
x12. Maryland (2-10)

Big XII
*1. Oklahoma State (11-1)
*2. Kansas State (10-2)
*3. Baylor (9-3)
*3. Oklahoma (9-3)
*5. Missouri (7-5)
*5. Texas (7-5)
*7. Iowa State (6-6)
*7. Texas A&M (6-6)
x9. Texas Tech (5-7)
x10. Kansas (2-10)

Big East
*1. Cincinnati (9-3)
*1. West Virginia (9-3)
*3. Rutgers (8-4)
*4. Louisville (7-5)
*5. Pittsburgh (6-6)
x6. Connecticut (5-7)
x6. South Florida (5-7)
x6. Syracuse (5-7)

Big Ten
*1. Wisconsin (11-2)
*2. Michigan (10-2)
*3. Michigan State (10-3)
*4. Nebraska (9-3)
*4. Penn State (9-3)
*6. Iowa (7-5)
*7. Illinois (6-6)
*7. Northwestern (6-6)
*7. Ohio State (6-6)
*7. Purdue (6-6)
x11. Minnesota (3-9)
x12. Indiana (1-11)

Pac-12
*1. Stanford (11-1)
*2. Oregon (11-2)
*2. USC (10-2)
*4. California (7-5)
*4. Utah (7-5)
*4. Washington (7-5)
*7. Arizona State (6-6)
?7. UCLA (6-7)
x9. Arizona (4-8)
x9. Washington State (4-8)
x11. Oregon State (3-9)
x12. Colorado (3-10)

SEC
*1. LSU (13-0)
*2. Alabama (11-1)
*3. Arkansas (10-2)
*3. South Carolina (10-2)
*5. Georgia (10-3)
*6. Auburn (7-5)
*7. Florida (6-6)
*7. Mississippi State (6-6)
*7. Vanderbilt (6-6)
x10. Kentucky (5-7)
x10. Tennessee (5-7)
x12. Mississippi (2-10)

To rank the conferences, I've ranked the six conferences in five different categories:

1) Win/loss record versus the other AQ (automatic qualifier) conferences
2) Percentage of non-conference games versus AQ conference teams
3) Record of teams in wins versus AQ conferences
4) Record of teams in losses versus AQ conferences
5) Percentage of games versus I-AA teams

I sorted through all the statistics and ranked the six conferences in the before-mentioned five categories. I then devised a formula by ranking the categories by importance.

1) I saw the win/loss record versus the other AQ conferences as being the most important, so I multiplied the conferences' ranking by 2.50.

2) The record of teams in wins versus AQ conferences I saw as second most important and I'll multiply the conferences' ranking by 2.00.

3) The third most important category as far as I see it is the record of teams in losses versus AQ conferences. I multiply the ranking by 1.50.

4) The percentage of non-conference games versus AQ conference teams is fourth most important from my vantage point and I multiply the ranking by 1.00.

5) Lastly is the percentage of non-conference games against I-AA opponents. I multiply these rankings by 0.50.

I then added up the five scores, the lowest of which will rank #1 in term's of conference strength and the highest which will rank last or 6th in this case. I'll now run down the statistics category by category from one through five based on importance.

Record vs. AQ Conference Teams
1. SEC: 9-3 (.750)
2. Big XII: 6-3 (.667)
3. Big Ten: 6-5 (.545)
4. Pac-12: 6-7 (.463)
5. ACC: 8-10 (.444)
6. Big East: 4-10 (.286)

Record of Teams in Wins vs. AQ Conferences
1. SEC: 73-37 (.664)
2. Big XII: 36-37 (.493)
3. ACC: 42-54 (.438)
4. Big East: 20-28 (.417)
5. Big Ten: 29-44 (.397)
6. Pac-12: 27-46 (.370)

Record of Teams in Losses vs. AQ Conferences
1. Pac-12: 65-22 (.747)
2. ACC: 86-36 (.705)
3. Big Ten: 41-19 (.683)
4. SEC: 25-12 (.676)
5. Big XII: 24-12 (.667)
6. Big East: 74-47 (.612)

Percentage of Non-Conference Games vs. AQ Conference Teams
1. ACC: 18/48 (37.5%)
2. Pac-12: 13/36 (36.1%)
3. Big East: 14/40 (35.0%)
4. Big XII: 9/30 (30.0%)
5. SEC: 12/48 (25.0%)
6. Big Ten: 11/48 (22.9%)

Percentage of Games vs. 1-AA Teams
1. Big XII: 6/30 (20.0%)
1. Big East: 8/40 (20.0%)
3. Big Ten: 10/48 (20.8%)
4. Pac-12: 8/36 (22.2%)
5. SEC: 12/48 (25.0%)
6. ACC: 13/48 (27.1%)

Here are how I attained the final sums:

ACC: 12.50 (5 * 2.50) + 6.00 (3 * 2.00) + 3.00 (2 * 1.50) + 1.00 (1 * 1.00) + 3.00 (6 * 0.50) = 25.50
Big XII: 5.00 (2 * 2.50) + 4.00 (2 * 2.00) + 7.50 (5 * 1.50) + 4.00 (4 * 1.00) + 0.50 (1 * 0.50) = 22.00
Big East: 15.00 (6 * 2.50) + 8.00 (4 * 2.00) + 9.00 (6 * 1.50) + 3.00 (3 * 1.00) + 0.50 (1 * 0.50) = 35.50
Big Ten: 7.50 (3 * 2.50) + 10.00 (5 * 2.00) + 4.50 (3 * 1.50) + 6.00 (6 * 1.00) + 1.50 (3 * 0.50) = 29.50
Pac-12: 10.00 (4 * 2.50) + 12.00 (6 * 2.00) + 1.50 (1 * 1.50) + 2.00 (2 * 1.00) + 2.00 (4 * 0.50) = 27.50
SEC: 2.50 (1 * 2.50) + 2.00 (1 * 2.00) + 6.00 (4 * 1.50) + 5.00 (5 * 1.00) + 2.50 (5 * 0.50) = 18.00

The final rankings are as follows:

1. SEC (18.00)
2. Big XII (22.00)
3. ACC (25.50)
4. Pac-12 (27.50)
5. Big Ten (29.50)
6. Big East (35.50)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...