Skip to main content

Mueller Time: Less Filling, For Now...

From the outset, I have been wary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe. This is because it appeared as though his scope was rather limited, and not only that, collusion is such a broad term (and not a legal one), it'd be incredibly difficult to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt, at least when it comes to Donald Trump and/or his inner-circle actually conspiring (the actual legal term) with Russia. So when news came that Mueller had sent his report to Attorney General William Barr and Barr wrote in a letter that the president did not collude with Russia and that there was not enough evidence to charge nor exonerate him of obstruction of justice, I can't say I was terribly surprised. I was disappointed, sure, but not in any way shocked.

What I've been even more disappointed by throughout these Mueller proceedings has been the media. Donald Trump may be an incompetent moron who doesn't know his ass from pinky, but for as unintentional as it may be, he has this natural ability to play the modern-day mainstream media, which is ironic, considering he typically lambasts them with liberal-bias claims. But think about it... The mainstream media treated Donald Trump like a reality star from the start of his campaign through election day. He wasn't properly vetted. He was simply followed around by what appeared to be super-fans just wanting to know what he'd do, say, or eat next. This humanized him as a person, yet made him come across as a non-threatening force as a politician. The media didn't ramp up their vetting until after, to their surprise, Trump got elected president, and they though, "Oh, sh*t! We better finally do our job!" While they've definitely improved their investigative game post-election, they've suffered a setback when it comes to the Mueller probe. For nearly two years, members of the media speculated on what Mueller did and didn't know; what he would and wouldn't find; what would and wouldn't result from his findings. Hell, they weren't even sure what he was specifically investigating, so they'd provide the world with their theories on that front as well. Now, before any of us, including them, have read the Mueller report, they're declaring to the world they know what's in the Mueller report. There have been reports suggesting the Mueller write-up is approximately 700 pages in length. AG Barr's write-up of the write-up was 4 pages. So if that first number is in any way accurate, Barr's write-up would represent just one-half of one percent of the actual report. To place that into perspective, if a person making $1 million annually earned one-half of one percent, he/she'd make just $5,000 for the year.

So what do we know? Robert Mueller worked for close to two years on a probe into Russia's meddling in out 2016 presidential election. During the proceedings, over 30 were indicted, 8 were arrested, and in the cases which have been decided, over 10 years will be spent in prison by these individuals. Russian meddling occurred in the 2016 election. Donald Trump's hand-picked Attorney General William Barr summarized the alleged 700-page report in four pages, claiming the president didn't collude with Russia and that there's not enough evidence to charge nor exonerate him of obstruction. That's pretty much all we know at this time, yet Trump, his inner-circle, Republican politicians, and the mainstream media seem to think they know a great deal more.

While I've been wary of the Mueller probe from the outset, when standing back and attempting to see the full picture, I'm becoming increasingly more curious about the report's findings. First off, while proving Trump conspired with Russia may be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, as I've said many times before, there are no two ways about it - the man obstructed justice. The only possible defense Trump and his supporters could have would be to claim the President of the United States of America is too stupid to know what obstruction of justice actually is, so he couldn't have intended to obstruct the Mueller probe. What they'd essentially be saying is that ignorance is in fact bliss for the leader of this country. Yeah, as Trump would tweet, "SAD!" In addition to that, given Trump and his minions' behavior throughout the Mueller proceedings, I have an incredibly difficult time seeing them get off scot-free (or Scott Free according to some, well, one). How many people lied to protect Trump during the probe? How many did Trump direct to lie to protect himself? How many times did Trump himself lie to protect himself? The man wouldn't testify under oath. He fired multiple high ranking officials who had tie-ins with the investigation. Hell, he admitted, flat out, that he fired former FBI Director James Comey because of "the Russia thing." Through both his words and actions, Donald Trump has gone on to make himself look like the guiltiest SOB this side of Jeffrey Dahmer munching on a tricep at an all-you-can-eat buffet at his neighbor's house. Trump and his inner-circle have changed their stories countless times. The goalposts have similarly shifted more times than Count Chocula can count. Even more recently, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has blocked an attempt for the full Mueller report to be released to the public. If Trump and/or his cohorts are in any way guilty, all of the before-mentioned events would make sense. If not, they'll likely go down as the stupidest non-criminal-criminals in history. In any case, unlike the media, let's wait to see what comes of the Mueller report before we make a determination on it one way or the other.

Fortunately, at least in early post-Mueller-probe polls, it appears as though the American public's opinion of Trump hasn't shifted. In fact, his likability rating has decreased. Apparently some Republicans wanted Trump to have colluded with a foreign dictator... In any case, it appears as though the people at large haven't bought the crap Barr and Trump are selling, and are awaiting Mueller's full report before placing judgment. I suggest the rest of us do similarly. Sure, we may find "Mueller Time" to be less filling for now, but perhaps it'll taste great in the end. Even if it doesn't, as I've said for a long time, Trump has a lot more to be afraid of with the SDNY's investigation than Mueller. With Mueller, I've been wary. With the SDNY, Trump should be sh*tting himself, "bigly."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"