Skip to main content

The Art of Exaggeration

Always. Never. Ever. Forever. None. All. Exaggerators are much like true/false questions on exams. If we see any of the before-mentioned words, such as never, then the answer is likely false, just as the person's story is.

Know anyone like this? Does it really aid the story to exaggerate to a point of unbelievability? Sometimes it's ridiculous.

As a person is speaking to me, they'll state something like, "Man, that test took forever!"

At this point, I carefully gaze about what they're doing, to check and see if they're still working on the exam, because if what they said is true, they wouldn't be finished with it yet.

Sometimes, it seems that certain people have about as little concept of time as dogs. If I walk outside to get the mail and only a minute has lapsed between the time I left the house and walked back in, the dogs will greet me like it had been a month, because it seemed like "forever" to them. Some people seem to be similar to dogs in this area.

Numbers seem to enter the equation (story) on many occasions. Many believe that as the large numbers used in the story increase, so too will the impact of the story.

"I told her like a million times that I didn't want to go eat at Runza, but still, she insisted."

I highly doubt that occurred. Can you imagine someone actually repeating a phrase one million consecutive times? Whew. That's cause for going nuts. Heck, when a person repeats themselves more than three times, that's usually cause for a, "Shut up! I can hear you! I get the point! Now, stop saying that!" Can you imagine how someone would react to a person repeating a phrase 1,000,000 times? Loony bin, here we come!

It's even funnier when the same person switches quantities dealing with the same story. One minute, it's "I told her like a million times that I didn't want to go eat at Runza, but still she insisted."

But, then, another friend sits down at the table and gets to hear the story from the beginning. "Dude, I told her like a thousand times that I didn't want to go eat at Runza, but still, she insisted."

I might then chime in and say, "I thought you said it was a million times."

He'll respond with something like, "Whatever. Whatever it was, it was a ton!"

It's not like I can tell a story about the final score of a football game being 28-24 one minute and then alter it to 17-10 the next. The word "always" is often times amusing as well.

"We've always been like this, she and I. We've always loved each other."

Again, I have to ponder and ask myself, "Okay, how long have they known one another? A year? So, one out of twenty-five years? How long have humans existed? Hmmm, always might be stretching it, just a tad."

I don't know that there is an art of exaggeration. That may have been sarcastic on my part. Go figure, right? The truth is that exaggeration is "always" a necessary tool when conversing with another, especially if the two individuals are politicians, it "never" gets to the point where it's so unbelievable one could easily laugh and it shall "forever" be used as a boost to our egos. Right guys?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

Book Ranking Update

Three of my four books are now in the top 100,000, including one of the new two: "The Kind-Hearted Smart Aleck (censored version)" (2011) - 149,246 "The Kind-Hearted Smarta*s (uncensored version)" (2011) - 96,347 "Seasons Come, People Grow: A Poetic Journey" (2006) - 57,336 "The Serious Scale of Sarcasm: More Balanced Than a Drunken High-Heeled Clown On a Tight Rope" (2007) - 39,666 Let's keep those numbers going in the right direction, meaning down, I suppose! (http://www.lulu.com or can be purchased elsewhere)