Skip to main content

Online Ambiguity

Sometimes it's difficult to interpret words we read on a screen. This can even happen when words are spoken, but is even more prevalent when read, I find.

From experiences I've had and ones I've heard about, mood seems to dictate interpretation. While feelings may have been shared in an e-mail or an instant message, it can be like reading text from a character in a book. While the words may provoke emotion, where the feelings reside is within ourselves.

There is no voice with the words that can be heard. If one is crying, we cannot hear and feel that. While one may type something like ::crying:: and that may be somewhat saddening to read, it does not carry with it the same empathetic impact as actually hearing or seeing a person cry. This is why I find the concept of cybersex to be so silly. How can someone actually get aroused through that? If someone messaged me with some dirty lingo, attempting to hit on me in cyberspace, I'm sure I'd bust out laughing.

Depending upon if a person is sad, angry, confused, content, shy, hyper or whatever mood they're in at that moment, they may interpret what I write differently. This has gotten me into trouble at times, especially through e-mails. Because as opposed to face-to-face or telephone conversations, where people can ask questions on the spot to hopefully clear away any misunderstanding, this can't be done via e-mail. Two people may write one another thinking about completely different things and may be on completely different wavelengths when writing their e-mail and reading the other's. A male may ask the female to hang out sometime, with the intent being to just hang out. The female may then take this as a date and happily accept. They then may write back and forth with completely different visions of their date/hang-out session. This will cause problems when that day arrives, where either one party will be content and the other disappointed or they will need to make up for the previous week's misunderstandings, ask questions, understand one another's intentions and the situation at hand, and hopefully reach a healthy compromise where both parties can enjoy their time together. It would've been much easier to have conversed over the telephone, where any misunderstandings could have been discussed right then and there, as opposed to allowing things to build for an entire week, where the anticipation and hopes (especially of the female) came to a crashing halt.

The online world is a nice form of communication, especially for those whom may live rather far away from yourself. But when it comes to the locals, it's important to be careful with one's wording and to make sure that there aren't any misunderstandings. Because of that, it may be better to just stick with the phone for the locals.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...