Skip to main content

Online Ambiguity

Sometimes it's difficult to interpret words we read on a screen. This can even happen when words are spoken, but is even more prevalent when read, I find.

From experiences I've had and ones I've heard about, mood seems to dictate interpretation. While feelings may have been shared in an e-mail or an instant message, it can be like reading text from a character in a book. While the words may provoke emotion, where the feelings reside is within ourselves.

There is no voice with the words that can be heard. If one is crying, we cannot hear and feel that. While one may type something like ::crying:: and that may be somewhat saddening to read, it does not carry with it the same empathetic impact as actually hearing or seeing a person cry. This is why I find the concept of cybersex to be so silly. How can someone actually get aroused through that? If someone messaged me with some dirty lingo, attempting to hit on me in cyberspace, I'm sure I'd bust out laughing.

Depending upon if a person is sad, angry, confused, content, shy, hyper or whatever mood they're in at that moment, they may interpret what I write differently. This has gotten me into trouble at times, especially through e-mails. Because as opposed to face-to-face or telephone conversations, where people can ask questions on the spot to hopefully clear away any misunderstanding, this can't be done via e-mail. Two people may write one another thinking about completely different things and may be on completely different wavelengths when writing their e-mail and reading the other's. A male may ask the female to hang out sometime, with the intent being to just hang out. The female may then take this as a date and happily accept. They then may write back and forth with completely different visions of their date/hang-out session. This will cause problems when that day arrives, where either one party will be content and the other disappointed or they will need to make up for the previous week's misunderstandings, ask questions, understand one another's intentions and the situation at hand, and hopefully reach a healthy compromise where both parties can enjoy their time together. It would've been much easier to have conversed over the telephone, where any misunderstandings could have been discussed right then and there, as opposed to allowing things to build for an entire week, where the anticipation and hopes (especially of the female) came to a crashing halt.

The online world is a nice form of communication, especially for those whom may live rather far away from yourself. But when it comes to the locals, it's important to be careful with one's wording and to make sure that there aren't any misunderstandings. Because of that, it may be better to just stick with the phone for the locals.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...