Skip to main content

Altering History Via Wikipedia


After she flubbed with regard to the history of Paul Revere’s Ride, Sarah Palin was quick to defend herself and many of her supporters attempted to alter history in order to justify their hero’s statements. They tried doing this via the online site, Wikipedia.[1] This is a good indicator one is on the losing side of an argument - The Wikipedia loophole. All other news-related sites may counter Ms. Palin’s statement(s), but as long as Wikipedia has her back, it proves she knows her history! It reminds me of the time I answered a question on my college algebra final wrong, but after I tinkered with Wikipedia, I showed the professor and she gave me the 100% that I so deserved. It also reminds me of the time Ms. Palin and John McCain lost the 2008 presidential election, but after their supporters wrote that they had won the election via Wikipedia, that sealed the deal for the Republican Party. Why I haven’t seen Maverick McCain in the Oval Office much in the past 2+ years is beyond me and has me quite perplexed.

Due to this lame attempt to change the course of history, I thought it’d be fun to turn the tables and create a Wikipedia page entitled, “Sarah Palin Supporters”. Remember, since the following is in writing and on a fictionalized Wikipedia page, it’s factual.

Sarah Palin Supporters

As of June 13th, 2011, Sarah Palin has 392,496 supporters, down from 2,995,214 the day after Election Day in 2008.

Of these supporters: 23.1% are literate; 42.3% have the name Sarah tattooed to some part of their body (numbers were not disclosed as to which body parts were the most popular); 92.0% don’t believe that both a subject and predicate are needed to form a complete sentence; 96.9% believe that George W. Bush was this country’s first president; 2.2% believe that 2 + 2 = 4; 89.1% want to go pheasant hunting with Dick Cheney and 50.1% want to one day fly to the moon via a Ford Ranger while listening to Toby Keith’s “Angry American”.


[1] Sarah Palin quit as governor of Alaska after just half a term. Revising history can be fun! Oh, I’m being told this is actually true.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...