Skip to main content

Flip-Floppers (in general)

Of course, there's flip-flopping in politics, but there are plenty of people outside of politics who flip-flop regularly as well.

Know anyone like this? It gets a tad annoying, doesn't it? One day, they may complain about someone they're dating. The next day, they absolutely hate the person they're dating. The third day, they're in love with this same person. Fourth day, they're not sure if things are going to work. Fifth day, things are good again, but not great. Sixth day, he or she mentions that there's definitely a mutual attraction on a physical level, but they're not sure if that's all it is. Seventh day, they break up. Eighth day, they're boyfriend and girlfriend again. Ever know anyone like that?

Flip-flopping happens sometimes. We have the right to change our minds about something or our viewpoints as we learn about and experience new things. But if anything is done in excess, it can get to be quite irritating, just like in the example above. Flip-flopping once in a great while is tolerable, because we all do it here and there. But flip-flopping about the same topic on an average of once per day for a week or two? That's annoying. After a while, it just becomes the norm and you don't think anything of it anymore.

It's like if someone used space fillers a great deal, such as the word "like" or if vulgar words spit out of a person's mouth two times in an average sentence. If someone says the word "like" once in a while or swears every now and again, then it's tolerable. The vulgar language may even be more effective, since it's not constant. If they're used consistent and often, then the only words one hears anymore are "like, like and like, like whatever, like totally" or the expletives. When one has gotten used to it (in a way), then it becomes a regular expectation. Going into the conversation, one then expects the excessive space fillers or profanities and it just becomes "normal."

A person isn't going to think anything of the flip-flopping if it continues consistently for a long period of time. They'll probably give up in trying to help out with the situation, because regardless of what they say, they know darn well the other person isn't going to listen and is going to flip-flop the next day (and the day after). It's then common for the listening party to wonder about the friendship or to ponder about if they ever knew the person at all. It's like with former President Bush's constant flip-flopping. While he may have appeased some conservatives, many scratched their heads and wondered who this guy was and what he truly believed.  Same thing in this situation. We're not going to know who that person truly is, what they feel or what they believe, if they constantly change their minds. It's very confusing if one thinks about it enough. I used to, but have chosen to give my mind a break, because whether or not I analyze the situation properly, it'd never amount to anything with a constant flip-flopper.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...