I've read and heard many people state that those who believe the claims made in "The Da Vinci Code" are extremely gullible. Most of these people are firm believers in Christianity. Let's look at this from a non-biased perspective, shall we? Who's more gullible? One who believes that a male got married to a woman, had children with her and his lineage is still alive and well today or one who believes that a man resided in his mother whom never had intercourse, that this man was perfect every day of his life, that he sacrificed himself for the world's wrong doings and that he rose from the dead three days after his death? Looking at it from a non-biased perspective, how can one possibly say that the former is more gullible than the latter?
My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"
Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html
Comments
Post a Comment