Skip to main content

Conservative? Liberal? What?

I got into a funny discussion with a friend a while back. She mentioned that she and her ex couldn't talk about anything. This was especially the case when anything involving politics or religion came up.

He'd always shoot back with a, "No, you're wrong," "You're being so ridiculous," "You're being irrational" or "I read a book about that once, so come back to me at another time when you've done your homework like I have."

Allright, so the guy knows everything, right? He thinks so, anyway.

But, after a long discussion with my friend, he seems very confused. Maybe the young lad doesn't know as much as he believes. Wouldn't that be something? My friend, we'll call her Lacey, does not like guns. She believes in gun laws. Heck, she'd feel a heck of a lot safer if there were no guns, period! Her ex, Gus we'll call him, doesn't believe in gun laws and claimed that Lacey was really liberal, because of her views on guns. Allright. But, Lacey witnessed the news one evening and overheard a young man who robbed a store and killed somebody, and stated that he should be punished. What did Gus say to this? "Gosh, you're really conservative on this, aren't you?"

Alright, so let me get this straight. If one supports gun laws, then they're liberal. If they support one being punished for a crime, they're conservative? What? So, liberals don't believe in any punishment or responsibility? Is that right, Gus? What, since Gus doesn't believe there should be any gun laws, should I thereby label him an anarchist? I could, but I won't.

While, for the most part, it is true that liberals favor gun laws more than conservatives, I have never heard that conservatives favor punishment, consequence and responsibility more than liberals. Heck, when it comes to politicians, it seems that so-called liberals and conservatives alike, only believe in punishment, consequence and responsibility when it comes to other countries or people whom don't agree with them in their own country. But for them personally? Heck no, there shouldn't be any punishment, consequence or responsibility! I'll give two examples, without names being mentioned, of course...

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman!"

"They have weapons of mass destruction!"

One of these quotes emanated from a Democrat's mouth and the other from a Republican's. Ah, yes, they were both extremely upstanding, honest people whom could fess up to wrongs they committed, prepare themselves for the consequences and take full responsibility for their actions. Uh-huh.

So, while I have to agree that more liberals favor gun laws than do conservatives, I can't understand the logic, reasoning or rationale behind saying conservatives believe in punishment, consequence and responsibility more than liberals. Sorry Gus, but you don't know as much as you think, so hit those books again and do your own homework!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...