Skip to main content

In the playoffs, is relief pitching more important than starting pitching?

Since the start of the playoffs, like most other commentators, Pardon the Interruption co-host Tony Kornheiser has been doubting the Kansas City Royals and their chances in the playoffs. After winning six consecutive games in the playoffs to take a 2-0 series lead against the Baltimore Orioles, Kornheiser appeared to finally stop his doubting, and actually said this on yesterday's show:

"It seems like, in the playoffs, relief pitchers are more important than the starters. Most all of these teams have solid starting pitching, but these guys only go 6, 7, 8 innings and then have to be taken out. It's the teams with the best bullpens that have an advantage." (paraphrasing)

I'd say I agree with Mr. Kornheiser up to an extent, but not fully. While there are exceptions, typically teams with the best starting rotations make the playoffs. Over a 162-game season, most every hitter and group of hitters will go through a slump or two. These everyday players will be set back here and there due to injuries. Barring injuries, it's those starting pitchers that perform once every five games which are the constants throughout the course of the season, and more times than not, play the biggest role in whether or not a team makes the post-season.

Playoff games tend to be quite different than regular season games, however. During the course of the season, there are times when the best will play a 3-game series against the worst, so they may wind up outscoring this team by 15+ runs over the course of the series. However, in the playoffs, it's the best playing the best day in and day out, so it's quite rare to see those 12-2 contests. The games tend to be low-scoring and due to that, manufacturing runs becomes more important than ever. Regardless, while starting pitching may be what ultimately gets most teams into the post-season, teams can't win without scoring runs, so while some of the very best pitchers in all of baseball may wind up playing in the post-season, so too will some of the league's best hitters. So, it's not as if it's a guarantee that these great starting pitchers are going to automatically pitch 6 to 8 solid innings come playoff time. Jon Lester struggled against Kansas City in the AL Wild Card game. Clayton Kershaw got lit up in the 7th inning in both of his starts in the NLDS. So, I don't think we can ultimately say that starting pitching is of any less importance in the post-season as it is in the regular season. Without 6 to 8 solid innings from the starter in a playoff game, how the bullpen performs will likely be irrelevant to the final outcome of the game.

So, I'm not sure I could say that like Kornheiser claimed, relief pitching is of greater importance than starting pitching in the playoffs. I will say, however, that relief pitching is of greater importance in the post-season than in the regular season. Like I mentioned earlier, it's not as if the teams with the worst group of bats typically make the playoffs. So, while a starting pitcher may be able to provide 7 quality innings for his team, if there isn't a consistent 8th or 9th inning pitcher, chances are he won't have as smooth of a time against that very same line-up, and that could definitely spell trouble for a team in a 5- or 7-game series against one of the best clubs in the league.

Just look at the Detroit Tigers. The Tigers. led by Miguel Cabrera and Victor Martinez, put up some of the best offensive numbers in all of baseball this season. Also, led by Cy Young award winners Max Scherzer, Justin Verlander, and David Price, many analysts agreed they had the best 3-man playoff rotation of any team that made it to the post-season. However, while their bats hit fairly well in the first two games of the series and the starters performed decently, the bullpen was awful and ultimately lost the series for them. Detroit was able to get away with this inconsistency in the bullpen during the course of the regular season, as they wound up winning the AL Central by a game over Kansas City. However, chances are the Tigers would have clinched the division long before they did if the bullpen had been better. In any case, in facing one of the best teams in the American League and some of the best hitters in all of baseball, they weren't able to get away with this in a short 5-game series.

Many sports commentators seem to only look at over-powering starting pitchers and power hitters as being the main reasons for a team's success in making the post-season and also of having success in the post-season. This often times isn't the case, though. Big bats and/or big arms may be able to get a team into the playoffs, but unless a team is able to manufacture runs on offense through solid contact hitting, unselfish hitting, and speed, and unless they have a good bullpen, chances are they're not going to have much success in the playoffs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"